Obrela vs Wirespeed
Obrela is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Obrela targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Obrela is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Obrela targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Obrela (Services firm) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Obrela's good fit for european/mena buyers who need ot or maritime mdr and are comfortable with a microsof... or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ObrelaTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOnePalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Generic Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Four tiers: MDR Core Lite, Core Plus, CoreX Max, and CoreX Elite, with increasing detection content and hunting capabilities. Specialized modules (OT, Vessels, Brand) priced separately. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR. Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. OT, Vessels, and Brand modules each carry separate pricing on top of base MDR. Core and CoreX tiers are built around Microsoft Defender XDR and Sentinel, which may require Microsoft licensing you do not already own. Cloud workload monitoring currently supports only Microsoft Azure. AWS and GCP support is listed as 'future' on their website | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Not published | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareMaritimeEnergyManufacturingTelecommunications | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes (vendor-published). Obrela's website claims 11.2-minute average for critical incidents, but this is self-reported, not independently validated. | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR four times (2021, 2023, 2024, 2025) and included in Forrester Wave MDR Services Europe Q3 2025. Virtually no customer reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 3.7/5 (52 reviews, 63% recommend). Strong analyst recognition but almost no independent customer validation. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CRESTNCSC CIR Level 2Cyber EssentialsDESC (Dubai) | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CREST CertifiedNCSC CIR Level 2 Assured Service ProviderCyber EssentialsDESC Accreditation (Dubai)Microsoft MISA MemberTeleTrusT IT Security Made in EU | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2010 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Obrela and Wirespeed?
Obrela is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Obrela offers ≤15 minutes, Wirespeed offers Not disclosed.
How do Obrela and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
Obrela supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Obrela and not included with Wirespeed.
How does Obrela pricing compare to Wirespeed?
Obrela pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with Obrela: Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR; Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose Obrela or Wirespeed?
Choose Obrela if: european or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. Obrela is not ideal for north American or APAC organizations needing local SOC presence. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.