NRI SecureTechnologies vs SISA ProACT
NRI SecureTechnologies and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NRI SecureTechnologies targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NRI SecureTechnologies includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
NRI SecureTechnologies and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NRI SecureTechnologies targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NRI SecureTechnologies includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
NRI SecureTechnologies offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NRI SecureTechnologiesTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom quote, varies by monitoring scope, license count, users and support duration. Sold direct. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published. Detection metrics are not published, customers cannot benchmark MTTD or MTTR ahead of signing | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-PacificNorth America | |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentManufacturingPharmaceuticalsRetailMedia | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NRI Secure has very limited English-language community review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most public references come from Japanese enterprise press and NRI Group communications rather than independent buyer reviews. Buyers will need direct customer references. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (NRI Secure North America Branch, Oct 2023) | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2000 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between NRI SecureTechnologies and SISA ProACT?
NRI SecureTechnologies is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NRI SecureTechnologies covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do NRI SecureTechnologies and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
NRI SecureTechnologies supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with NRI SecureTechnologies and not included with SISA ProACT.
How does NRI SecureTechnologies pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
NRI SecureTechnologies pricing: Not published. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with NRI SecureTechnologies: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose NRI SecureTechnologies or SISA ProACT?
Choose NRI SecureTechnologies if: japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. NRI SecureTechnologies is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments and independently validated detection metrics. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.