NRI SecureTechnologies vs Performanta
NRI SecureTechnologies and Performanta are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NRI SecureTechnologies targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NRI SecureTechnologies includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
NRI SecureTechnologies and Performanta are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NRI SecureTechnologies targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NRI SecureTechnologies includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
NRI SecureTechnologies offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 2). Performanta may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NRI SecureTechnologiesTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote, varies by monitoring scope, license count, users and support duration. Sold direct. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published. Detection metrics are not published, customers cannot benchmark MTTD or MTTR ahead of signing | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-PacificNorth America | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentManufacturingPharmaceuticalsRetailMedia | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NRI Secure has very limited English-language community review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most public references come from Japanese enterprise press and NRI Group communications rather than independent buyer reviews. Buyers will need direct customer references. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (NRI Secure North America Branch, Oct 2023) | – |
| Founded | 2000 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between NRI SecureTechnologies and Performanta?
NRI SecureTechnologies is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NRI SecureTechnologies covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do NRI SecureTechnologies and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
NRI SecureTechnologies supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with NRI SecureTechnologies and not included with Performanta.
How does NRI SecureTechnologies pricing compare to Performanta?
NRI SecureTechnologies pricing: Not published. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with NRI SecureTechnologies: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose NRI SecureTechnologies or Performanta?
Choose NRI SecureTechnologies if: japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. NRI SecureTechnologies is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments and independently validated detection metrics. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.