Nomios vs Sapphire
Nomios and Sapphire are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Nomios targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Sapphire serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Nomios and Sapphire are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Nomios targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Sapphire serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship | UK organisations that want MDR from a UK-owned provider with a UK-based CREST-accredited SOC |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- UK organisations that want MDR from a UK-owned provider with a UK-based CREST-accredited SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NomiosTECH-AGNOSTIC | SapphireTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender for EndpointCustomer EDR through Custom MDR | EDR toolsMicrosoft technologies |
| SIEM integrations | Nomios Sovereign Managed SIEMMicrosoft SentinelSplunkIBM QRadarPalo Alto Networks XSIAM | ExabeamSIEM tools |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered Guardian xMDR pricing and custom pricing for tailored MDR. Public materials state Guardian xMDR has Essential, Core, Advanced and Elite tiers, with scoping starting from endpoint count and expanding by coverage needs. Public price amounts are not listed. | Custom quote. Sapphire does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.. Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack.. Coverage outside Cortex XDR's native library may require the Sovereign Managed SIEM extension.. Custom MDR can keep existing tools, but SIEM, EDR and data-retention costs remain part of total cost.. No public breach warranty, trial or fixed response-time SLA was found. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or exact response-authority rules.. MDR, MXDR and OT SOC scope can differ materially, so buyers should define monitored surfaces in the order form.. The page publishes vendor-reported comparative metrics without independent methodology.. IR hours are included as standard, but buyers should confirm number of hours, coverage triggers and overage rates. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Subscription, Custom | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Guardian xMDR is positioned as structured and fast to deploy; Custom MDR is scoped through direct engagement based on existing tools and required detection engineering. | Sapphire references onboarding and implementation that can be shorter than expected, but no standard public MDR onboarding timeline was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareManufacturingFinancial ServicesGovernmentRetailTechnology | Public SectorDefenceFinancial ServicesProfessional ServicesIndustrialsManufacturingOperational TechnologyHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Nomios has a European infrastructure and security-services footprint, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. The clearest public evidence is from Nomios' own MDR page and Guardian xMDR launch material rather than independent managed-service evaluations. | Sapphire has limited MDR-specific community review volume. The public buyer case is strongest for UK ownership, UK-based SOC delivery, CREST SOC accreditation and IT/OT services depth. Buyers should validate response authority, price, metrics and the exact split between MDR, MXDR, OT SOC and incident-response work. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPRNIS2DORA | ISO 27001NISTHIPAADORACyber Essentials PlusCRESTGDPRPCI DSS |
| Certifications | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type II | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCyber Essentials PlusISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2004 | 1996 |
| Data retention | Not published as a fixed MDR retention period. Nomios states Guardian xMDR customer data is hosted within the EU; retention should be confirmed by tier and SIEM scope. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Nomios and Sapphire?
Nomios is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sapphire is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Nomios and Sapphire differ in response capabilities?
Nomios supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Sapphire supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Nomios and included with Sapphire.
How does Nomios pricing compare to Sapphire?
Nomios pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Sapphire pricing: Not published. Watch for with Nomios: Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.; Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack.. Watch for with Sapphire: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or exact response-authority rules.; MDR, MXDR and OT SOC scope can differ materially, so buyers should define monitored surfaces in the order form..
Should I choose Nomios or Sapphire?
Choose Nomios if: european buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship. Choose Sapphire if: uK organisations that want MDR from a UK-owned provider with a UK-based CREST-accredited SOC. Nomios is not ideal for buyers that need public per-endpoint price amounts before a sales call. Sapphire is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.