NetWitness vs SISA ProACT
NetWitness is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. NetWitness targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NetWitness includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
NetWitness is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. NetWitness targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NetWitness includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
NetWitness is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. SISA ProACT is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NetWitnessPLATFORM | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | NetWitness Endpoint | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | NetWitness LogsNetWitness Platform XDR | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Public materials describe customized MDR offerings based on NetWitness Platform XDR scope, analyst support, administration needs, threat hunting, incident management and partner delivery. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The MDR offer is tied to NetWitness Platform XDR. Buyers without NetWitness deployed should price platform licensing, deployment and operations effort alongside MDR service fees.. The public MDR datasheet describes customized services, so scope may vary by customer and delivery partner.. Current IT/OT MDR material is a NetWitness and Lumifi partnership. Buyers should confirm which company owns monitoring, escalation, response authority and support accountability.. No public price floor, public response SLA, breach warranty or trial was found. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | Not published. Scope depends on the existing NetWitness Platform XDR deployment, telemetry sources, detection content, administration needs and Lumifi or other partner involvement. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentFinancial ServicesEnergyHealthcareTransportationIndustrial | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NetWitness has a long-running platform business, but MDR-specific public peer reviews are limited and current public materials lean on datasheets and partnership announcements. Buyers should validate references for the exact delivery model: NetWitness Professional Services, Lumifi, or another certified partner. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | – | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | – | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 1997 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's NetWitness Platform XDR and log-storage architecture. | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between NetWitness and SISA ProACT?
NetWitness is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NetWitness covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do NetWitness and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
NetWitness supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does NetWitness pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
NetWitness pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with NetWitness: The MDR offer is tied to NetWitness Platform XDR. Buyers without NetWitness deployed should price platform licensing, deployment and operations effort alongside MDR service fees.; The public MDR datasheet describes customized services, so scope may vary by customer and delivery partner.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose NetWitness or SISA ProACT?
Choose NetWitness if: organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. NetWitness is not ideal for buyers wanting public per-endpoint MDR pricing. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.