NCC Group vs SISA ProACT
NCC Group and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NCC Group targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NCC Group includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
NCC Group and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NCC Group targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NCC Group includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
NCC Group offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NCC GroupTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrike | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunk | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Not published. Custom quotes. Evidence of large-scale enterprise pricing: EUR 25M+ contract for Netherlands university consortium (23+ universities, 5-year term). | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MXDR for Microsoft and MXDR for Splunk are separate offerings. Customers using both Sentinel and Splunk may face separate engagements.. Only Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike EDR integrations are confirmed. Other EDR platforms may not be supported.. Post-breach advisory limited to 2 hours included. Full IR engagement is a separate NCC Group consulting purchase.. SIEM licensing (Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk) is the customer's cost, not included in MXDR pricing | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Weeks, not months (vendor claim). Uses infrastructure-as-code deployment. Exact timeline not published. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentHigher EducationFinancial ServicesManufacturingEnergyTelecommunications | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | 25 minutes average time to close (vendor-published). 95% of threats resolved within 2 hours. | Not published |
| Community view | Strong analyst recognition: Forrester Wave MDR Europe Q3 2025 Strong Performer, IDC MarketScape European MDR 2024 Leader. Virtually no practitioner reviews on G2 (not MDR-specific), PeerSpot (0 reviews, ranked 43rd in MDR), or Reddit. Analyst praise for threat hunting and consultative approach, but buyers cannot reference peer experiences. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022ISO 9001:2015PCI QSAPCI ASV | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2022ISO 9001:2015PCI Qualified Security Assessor (QSA)PCI Approved Scan Vendor (ASV)FedRAMP 3PAO (Third-Party Assessment Organization) | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 1999 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published. | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between NCC Group and SISA ProACT?
NCC Group is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NCC Group covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do NCC Group and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
NCC Group supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with NCC Group and not included with SISA ProACT.
How does NCC Group pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
NCC Group pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with NCC Group: MXDR for Microsoft and MXDR for Splunk are separate offerings. Customers using both Sentinel and Splunk may face separate engagements.; Only Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike EDR integrations are confirmed. Other EDR platforms may not be supported.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose NCC Group or SISA ProACT?
Choose NCC Group if: european enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. NCC Group is not ideal for organizations running a SIEM other than Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk (only two supported). SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.