Macquarie Government vs NTT Security Holdings
Macquarie Government and NTT Security Holdings are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Macquarie Government targets Enterprise organizations, while NTT Security Holdings serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macquarie Government includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for NTT Security Holdings (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Buyer brief
Macquarie Government and NTT Security Holdings are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Macquarie Government targets Enterprise organizations, while NTT Security Holdings serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macquarie Government includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for NTT Security Holdings (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
NTT Security Holdings offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 3). Macquarie Government may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR | Global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage across NA, Europe, and APAC |
| Price | Custom quote | SamurAI XDR SaaS: $3.33/endpoint/mo; MDR custom |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage across NA, Europe, and APAC
- Price
- SamurAI XDR SaaS: $3.33/endpoint/mo; MDR custom
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC | NTT Security HoldingsTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs | CrowdStrike Falcon InsightMicrosoft Defender for EndpointVMware Carbon Black CloudFortinet FortiEDRTrellix Endpoint Security |
| SIEM integrations | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms | Fortinet FortiAnalyzer |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | Isolate |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. MDR is custom quoted. Vendor-published SamurAI XDR SaaS (self-service, not MDR): $3.33/endpoint/month. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | ≤30 minutes |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. | Custom quoted based on environment size, coverage areas, and service components. Note: SamurAI XDR SaaS (a self-service product, not MDR) is $3.33/endpoint/month. MDR pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Requires a separate retainer with separate pricing.. SamurAI Endpoint Agent and Network Traffic Analyzer are add-ons, not included in base service. Clarify which components are in your quote.. Gartner reviewers consistently cite NTT as expensive relative to competitors.. Alert severity over-classification reported by customers, leading to unnecessary after-hours calls for already-blocked threats.. New log source integrations can take significant development time according to customer reviews.. Analysis quality and portal flexibility vary by SOC region per Gartner feedback. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. | Official docs show ~16 days (2-day portal activation, 14-day orientation). NTT markets 'less than one week' but typical deployments are longer. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure | ManufacturingIndustrialFinancial ServicesEnergyHealthcareGovernmentTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.4/5 (21 reviews). NTT DATA (parent group) ranked second by revenue in Gartner Market Share Analysis for Managed Security Services Worldwide 2022. Reviewers praise responsiveness, team continuity, and global reach. Recurring complaints: expensive pricing, alert severity over-classification, and inconsistent analysis quality across SOC regions. Very limited Reddit/community discussion. |
| Compliance | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP | ISO 27001SOC 2 |
| Certifications | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language | ISO 27001SOC 2ISAE 3000 |
| Founded | – | 2000 |
| Data retention | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. | 12 months standard retention for security incident data |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macquarie Government and NTT Security Holdings?
Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NTT Security Holdings is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Macquarie Government offers Not disclosed, NTT Security Holdings offers ≤30 minutes. Macquarie Government covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for NTT Security Holdings.
How do Macquarie Government and NTT Security Holdings differ in response capabilities?
Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. NTT Security Holdings supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Macquarie Government pricing compare to NTT Security Holdings?
Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. NTT Security Holdings pricing: Not published. MDR is custom quoted. Vendor-published SamurAI XDR SaaS (self-service, not MDR): $3.33/endpoint/month.. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. Watch for with NTT Security Holdings: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Requires a separate retainer with separate pricing.; SamurAI Endpoint Agent and Network Traffic Analyzer are add-ons, not included in base service. Clarify which components are in your quote..
Should I choose Macquarie Government or NTT Security Holdings?
Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. Choose NTT Security Holdings if: global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage across NA, Europe, and APAC. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider. NTT Security Holdings is not ideal for sMBs wanting transparent pricing and self-service onboarding.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.