Macnica vs TENEX.AI
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for TENEX.AI (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Buyer brief
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for TENEX.AI (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Macnica (Services firm) and TENEX.AI (AI-native MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni... or TENEX.AI's tenex.ai fits buyers that want an ai-native mdr model with human analyst oversight and are alread....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting | Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model |
| Price | Custom quote | $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model
- Price
- $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC | TENEX.AITECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Trellix EDRCustomer EDR tools CrowdStrike Falcon | Microsoft DefenderSentinelOne CrowdStrike Falcon |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM and log platforms | Google Security OperationsGoogle ChronicleMicrosoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. | Package pricing by telemetry tier plus custom enterprise quotes. The homepage lists 25TB, 50TB and 100TB MDR packages, but the billing period and overage terms are not stated on the page. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. | Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.. No public contractual SLA found.. No public breach warranty found.. Exact response approval rules are not published.. Ticketing integrations, data retention and evidence export details are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmail |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications | TechnologyFinancial ServicesBusiness Services |
| MTTD | Not published | AI telemetry analysis within a minute, vendor-reported in third-party coverage |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. | TENEX.AI is a young AI-native MDR provider with public funding coverage and partner claims, but independent practitioner review volume is still thin. The main public evidence is official product material, a January 2025 launch announcement and March 2026 funding coverage. |
| Compliance | – | – |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | – | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macnica and TENEX.AI?
Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TENEX.AI is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for TENEX.AI.
How do Macnica and TENEX.AI differ in response capabilities?
Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. TENEX.AI supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Macnica and included with TENEX.AI.
How does Macnica pricing compare to TENEX.AI?
Macnica pricing: Not published. TENEX.AI pricing: Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom.. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Watch for with TENEX.AI: Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.; No public contractual SLA found..
Should I choose Macnica or TENEX.AI?
Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Choose TENEX.AI if: mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement. TENEX.AI is not ideal for buyers who need complete public pricing, including billing period and overage terms, before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.