Macnica vs SECUINFRA
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Macnica (Services firm) and SECUINFRA (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni... or SECUINFRA's fits german and eu buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work insid....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting | German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC | SECUINFRATECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM and log platforms | Microsoft SentinelSplunkElasticIBM QRadar |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. | Custom quote, varies by chosen tier (full-service MDR, Co-Managed MDR, On-Premises MDR) and integrated SIEM and EDR. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. | On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing. Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response. No published SLA, response timing depends on the underlying SIEM and EDR you bring |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. | Vendor reports onboarding compressed from 1 week to 1 day for Microsoft-stack customers |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications | ManufacturingFinancial ServicesPublic SectorHealthcareEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. | SECUINFRA has a Gartner Peer Insights vendor profile in the MDR category but limited English-language community coverage on G2 and PeerSpot. Most public sentiment comes from German-language IT press and the firm's own publishing. Buyers shopping outside Germany should expect to lean on direct references. |
| Compliance | – | ISO 27001:2013 |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001:2013 (TÜV Thüringen, scope covers Berlin and Frankfurt) |
| Founded | – | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macnica and SECUINFRA?
Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for SECUINFRA.
How do Macnica and SECUINFRA differ in response capabilities?
Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. SECUINFRA supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Macnica and included with SECUINFRA.
How does Macnica pricing compare to SECUINFRA?
Macnica pricing: Not published. SECUINFRA pricing: Not published. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Watch for with SECUINFRA: On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing; Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response.
Should I choose Macnica or SECUINFRA?
Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Choose SECUINFRA if: german SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement. SECUINFRA is not ideal for non-European multinationals needing 24/7 follow-the-sun coverage from regional SOCs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.