Macnica vs PAGO Networks
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; PAGO Networks serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; PAGO Networks serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Macnica (Services firm) and PAGO Networks (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni... or PAGO Networks's apac-focused mdr with active remediation, multi-vendor edr/xdr support via stellar cyber, dark we....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting | Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC | PAGO NetworksTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools | SentinelOneDeep Instinct |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM and log platforms | Stellar Cyber Open XDR |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | + Optional |
| Identity | + Optional | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. | Custom quotes based on endpoint/device count and coverage scope. No published pricing tiers. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. | No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.. Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. OT/ICS coverage is a separate add-on via a CyberXCenter partnership, not part of the base MDR service.. Most documentation, case studies, and support materials are in Korean. English-language resources are limited. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | Asia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. | Not published |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications | ManufacturingChemicalSemiconductorRetailTechnologyFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025). Gartner Peer Insights shows 5.0/5 across 50+ reviews, though most reviewers are from APAC. Great Place To Work certified 2025-2026. Very little visibility in Western cybersecurity communities. |
| Compliance | – | – |
| Certifications | – | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025)Great Place To Work Certified 2025-2026 |
| Founded | – | 2017 |
| Data retention | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macnica and PAGO Networks?
Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Macnica and PAGO Networks differ in response capabilities?
Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. PAGO Networks supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Macnica and included with PAGO Networks.
How does Macnica pricing compare to PAGO Networks?
Macnica pricing: Not published. PAGO Networks pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Watch for with PAGO Networks: No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.; Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one..
Should I choose Macnica or PAGO Networks?
Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Choose PAGO Networks if: organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement. PAGO Networks is not ideal for north American or European organizations needing SOC presence in those regions (PAGO has no operational SOCs there yet).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.