Macnica vs NVISO
Macnica and NVISO are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NVISO serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for NVISO (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Macnica and NVISO are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NVISO serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for NVISO (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
NVISO offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 2). Macnica may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting | European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC | NVISOTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools | Palo Alto CortexMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM and log platforms | Microsoft SentinelElastic |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. | Custom pricing based on managed service scope, telemetry sources, portal and ITSM integration, detection analytics, threat hunting, incident response support and platform choices such as Cortex, SentinelOne or Microsoft tooling. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. | No public price floor or package table was found.. The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately.. NVISO CSIRT support backs the MDR service, but buyers should confirm which DFIR hours are included and what requires a separate retainer.. The portal exposes SLA status, but public materials do not publish fixed response-time terms or service credits.. No public breach warranty or trial was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. | Not published. Scope depends on telemetry sources, ITSM integration, platform choices and whether NVISO runs a dedicated, co-managed or outsourced operational model. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications | Financial ServicesTechnologyGovernmentManufacturingAerospaceCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. | NVISO has credible European security-operations and incident-response evidence, including MITRE managed-services participation and public customer references, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. |
| Compliance | – | ISO 27001GDPR |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001SOC 2 attestation, type not publishedSOC-CMM Gold PartnerPalo Alto Networks Cortex XMDR SpecializationMicrosoft Intelligent Security Association memberMicrosoft Security Solutions Partner |
| Founded | – | 2013 |
| Data retention | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's monitoring platforms and contract scope. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macnica and NVISO?
Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NVISO is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for NVISO.
How do Macnica and NVISO differ in response capabilities?
Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. NVISO supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Macnica pricing compare to NVISO?
Macnica pricing: Not published. NVISO pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Watch for with NVISO: No public price floor or package table was found.; The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately..
Should I choose Macnica or NVISO?
Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Choose NVISO if: european mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement. NVISO is not ideal for buyers needing public per-endpoint pricing before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.