Lumifi vs Macquarie Government
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macquarie Government is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. Lumifi includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macquarie Government is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. Lumifi includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Lumifi (Pure-play MDR) and Macquarie Government (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Lumifi's pe-backed mdr roll-up with healthcare specialization, ex-military soc personnel, and a technology... or Macquarie Government's macquarie government is strongest for australian agencies that need sovereign socaas backed by lo....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LumifiTECH-AGNOSTIC | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne Singularity XDRCrowdStrike FalconVMware Carbon BlackPalo Alto Cortex XDR | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelExabeamElasticStellar CyberNetWitnessEventTracker (Netsurion platform) | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and platform integrations. No public pricing information available. | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.. OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Roll-up strategy means the service you buy today may have been three different companies 13 months ago. Ask about integration status between Datashield, Netsurion, and Critical Insight operations.. Zero public pricing. No way to benchmark costs before a sales conversation.. Single US SOC in Scottsdale, AZ. No follow-the-sun coverage, which may affect overnight response quality. | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | APAC |
| Onboarding | Varies by integration complexity. API-based integrations for Microsoft Sentinel, Defender, and SentinelOne can take days to weeks. | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareCritical InfrastructureEnergyManufacturingFinancial ServicesLegalGovernment (local/state) | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.9/5 (25 reviews in Managed Security Services, 6 in MDR), but very small sample size. Virtually no Reddit or G2 discussion. Glassdoor 2.9/5 (25 employee reviews) with only 39% recommending and 22% positive business outlook. Compensation rated 3.3/5, down 17% year-over-year. The Gartner rating looks good on paper but the tiny review count and lack of independent practitioner discussion make it hard to assess real-world performance. | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IINIST CSFHIPAAPCI DSS | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (SOC facility attestation) | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language |
| Founded | 2022 | – |
| Data retention | Customer data remains on customer infrastructure in co-managed model. Retention varies by platform and contract. | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Lumifi and Macquarie Government?
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Lumifi covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Macquarie Government.
How do Lumifi and Macquarie Government differ in response capabilities?
Lumifi supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Lumifi pricing compare to Macquarie Government?
Lumifi pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Watch for with Lumifi: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.; OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose Lumifi or Macquarie Government?
Choose Lumifi if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base. Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. Lumifi is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics, transparent pricing, or independent validation (MITRE, Forrester) before committing. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.