LRQA Nettitude vs SISA ProACT
LRQA Nettitude and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LRQA Nettitude includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
LRQA Nettitude and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LRQA Nettitude includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
LRQA Nettitude offers broader coverage (2 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LRQA NettitudeTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderEndpoint Detection and Response tools | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEMCloud SIEM platforms | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Public LRQA pages do not publish MDR price bands or standard per-endpoint, per-user or per-GB pricing for the MDR service. Because MDR, SOC-as-a-Service, XDR, EDR, NDR, vulnerability management and incident response are described as a modular portfolio, buyers should confirm exactly what is in the quoted scope. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.. Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Physical SOC location, data residency and raw log export terms should be confirmed in writing. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | ||
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTechnologyEnergyManufacturingTransportationRetail | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | LRQA Nettitude has strong accreditation evidence, but public buyer-review signal for the MDR service itself is thin. G2's seller profile shows 3.8/5 across two Nettitude reviews, and they are not MDR-specific. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001PCI DSSNCSC CIRCRESTCyber EssentialsDORANIST CSFSOC 2 | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCREST Red TeamingCREST Incident ResponseCREST Threat IntelligenceNCSC Cyber Incident Response Assured Service ProviderMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2003 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between LRQA Nettitude and SISA ProACT?
LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LRQA Nettitude covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do LRQA Nettitude and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
LRQA Nettitude supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does LRQA Nettitude pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
LRQA Nettitude pricing: Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found.. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with LRQA Nettitude: Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.; Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose LRQA Nettitude or SISA ProACT?
Choose LRQA Nettitude if: uK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. LRQA Nettitude is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.