LRQA Nettitude vs Performanta
LRQA Nettitude and Performanta are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
LRQA Nettitude and Performanta are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LRQA NettitudeTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Endpoint Detection and Response tools Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEMCloud SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Public LRQA pages do not publish MDR price bands or standard per-endpoint, per-user or per-GB pricing for the MDR service. Because MDR, SOC-as-a-Service, XDR, EDR, NDR, vulnerability management and incident response are described as a modular portfolio, buyers should confirm exactly what is in the quoted scope. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.. Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Physical SOC location, data residency and raw log export terms should be confirmed in writing. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTechnologyEnergyManufacturingTransportationRetail | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | LRQA Nettitude has strong accreditation evidence, but public buyer-review signal for the MDR service itself is thin. G2's seller profile shows 3.8/5 across two Nettitude reviews, and they are not MDR-specific. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001PCI DSSNCSC CIRCRESTCyber EssentialsDORANIST CSFSOC 2 | – |
| Certifications | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCREST Red TeamingCREST Incident ResponseCREST Threat IntelligenceNCSC Cyber Incident Response Assured Service ProviderMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security | – |
| Founded | 2003 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between LRQA Nettitude and Performanta?
LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do LRQA Nettitude and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
LRQA Nettitude supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does LRQA Nettitude pricing compare to Performanta?
LRQA Nettitude pricing: Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with LRQA Nettitude: Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.; Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose LRQA Nettitude or Performanta?
Choose LRQA Nettitude if: uK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. LRQA Nettitude is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.