Kroll vs Mandiant: MDR Comparison 2026
Kroll (MDR provider) and Mandiant (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Kroll works with your existing tools, while Mandiant works with your existing tools. Kroll targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Mandiant focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Kroll vs Mandiant: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Mandiant does not)
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
Bottom line: Kroll (MDR provider) and Mandiant (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves... or Mandiant's threat intelligence-driven mdr backed by 500+ intel analysts, frontline ir experience, and google....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Kroll and Mandiant?
Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Kroll and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Kroll and not included with Mandiant.
How does Kroll pricing compare to Mandiant?
Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Kroll or Mandiant?
Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility). Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing.