Intezer vs Sattrix
Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Intezer includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Intezer includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Intezer (AI-native MDR) and Sattrix (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Intezer's ai-first approach to soc operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts or Sattrix's sattrix mdr fits buyers that want a services-led provider for managed detection, threat hunting a....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | IntezerTECH-AGNOSTIC | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderPalo Alto Cortex XDR | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticMicrosoft SentinelDevoSumo LogicWazuh | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact sales for pricing. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing with two tiers: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (unlimited alert sources). Pricing remains fixed regardless of alert volume increases. | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M). Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Managed SIEM and premium SLA support are paid add-ons on top of the base subscription. Full incident response not included. You get triage and guided remediation, not hands-on response. CarbonHelix 24/7 SOC is a separate engagement. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management |
| Channels | EmailPortalSlack | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | APAC |
| Onboarding | Minutes to connect alert sources via API | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailHospitalityLogistics | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation |
| MTTD | Sub-minute (median under 60 seconds) | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Users praise the intuitive UI, fast integration and detailed forensic analysis. Limited review volume compared to larger MDR vendors. Main concerns center on pricing transparency and the fact that escalated alerts go to your team, not Intezer analysts. | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
| Data retention | Not published | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Intezer and Sattrix?
Intezer is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Intezer covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Sattrix.
How do Intezer and Sattrix differ in response capabilities?
Intezer supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Intezer and included with Sattrix.
How does Intezer pricing compare to Sattrix?
Intezer pricing: Not published. Contact sales for pricing.. Sattrix pricing: Not published. Watch for with Intezer: No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M); Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage..
Should I choose Intezer or Sattrix?
Choose Intezer if: teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them. Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Intezer is not ideal for organizations requiring traditional human-led MDR with dedicated analysts for every escalation. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.