Intezer vs Performanta
Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Intezer includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Intezer includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Intezer (AI-native MDR) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Intezer's ai-first approach to soc operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | IntezerTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOnePalo Alto Cortex XDR Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticDevoSumo LogicWazuh Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact sales for pricing. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing with two tiers: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (unlimited alert sources). Pricing remains fixed regardless of alert volume increases. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M). Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Managed SIEM and premium SLA support are paid add-ons on top of the base subscription. Full incident response not included. You get triage and guided remediation, not hands-on response. CarbonHelix 24/7 SOC is a separate engagement. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalSlack | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Minutes to connect alert sources via API | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailHospitalityLogistics | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Sub-minute (median under 60 seconds) | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Users praise the intuitive UI, fast integration and detailed forensic analysis. Limited review volume compared to larger MDR vendors. Main concerns center on pricing transparency and the fact that escalated alerts go to your team, not Intezer analysts. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | – |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Intezer and Performanta?
Intezer is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Intezer covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do Intezer and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
Intezer supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Intezer pricing compare to Performanta?
Intezer pricing: Not published. Contact sales for pricing.. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with Intezer: No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M); Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose Intezer or Performanta?
Choose Intezer if: teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Intezer is not ideal for organizations requiring traditional human-led MDR with dedicated analysts for every escalation. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.