Innofactor MDRaaS vs NRI SecureTechnologies
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. NRI SecureTechnologies is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; NRI SecureTechnologies serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 5 for NRI SecureTechnologies (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. NRI SecureTechnologies is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; NRI SecureTechnologies serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 5 for NRI SecureTechnologies (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) and NRI SecureTechnologies (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke... or NRI SecureTechnologies's reasonable fit for organizations with japan operations that want a japanese-rooted soc and a deep....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel | Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC | NRI SecureTechnologiesTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. | Custom quote, varies by monitoring scope, license count, users and support duration. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published. Detection metrics are not published, customers cannot benchmark MTTD or MTTR ahead of signing |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPhonePortal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | Asia-PacificNorth America |
| Onboarding | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology | Financial ServicesGovernmentManufacturingPharmaceuticalsRetailMedia |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. | NRI Secure has very limited English-language community review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most public references come from Japanese enterprise press and NRI Group communications rather than independent buyer reviews. Buyers will need direct customer references. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations | SOC 2 Type II (NRI Secure North America Branch, Oct 2023) |
| Founded | 2000 | 2000 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Innofactor MDRaaS and NRI SecureTechnologies?
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NRI SecureTechnologies is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Innofactor MDRaaS covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for NRI SecureTechnologies.
How do Innofactor MDRaaS and NRI SecureTechnologies differ in response capabilities?
Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. NRI SecureTechnologies supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Innofactor MDRaaS and included with NRI SecureTechnologies.
How does Innofactor MDRaaS pricing compare to NRI SecureTechnologies?
Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. NRI SecureTechnologies pricing: Not published. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Watch for with NRI SecureTechnologies: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published.
Should I choose Innofactor MDRaaS or NRI SecureTechnologies?
Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Choose NRI SecureTechnologies if: japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement. NRI SecureTechnologies is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments and independently validated detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.