Innofactor MDRaaS vs LMNTRIX
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
LMNTRIX is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Innofactor MDRaaS is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel | Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product |
| Price | Custom quote | Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- Price
- Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC | LMNTRIXPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | LMNTRIX EDR (native)Third-party EDR log collection supported |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | LMNTRIX SIEM (native, integrated) Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. | Per-endpoint tiered pricing. Channel-only (sold exclusively through MSSP and channel partners). |
| Hidden cost warnings | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. | Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation. Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Portal still maturing. PeerSpot reviewers describe it as buggy, so factor in potential operational friction during onboarding.. All performance claims are self-reported with no MITRE evaluation or third-party benchmark. Insist on a POV to validate in your environment. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhonePortal | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Straightforward deployment with minimal configuration (per PeerSpot reviewers) |
| Industry focus | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | <1 minute for 90% of incidents (self-reported claim) |
| MTTR | Not published | 30 minutes for 90%+ of incidents (self-reported, no independent validation) |
| Community view | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. | High scores on review platforms but from very small sample sizes. Praised for competitive pricing, all-inclusive model, and responsive support. Criticized for buggy portal and small company size. Zero Reddit presence and no G2 listing, which limits independent validation. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS |
| Founded | 2000 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. | Not publicly disclosed |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Innofactor MDRaaS and LMNTRIX?
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Innofactor MDRaaS covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for LMNTRIX.
How do Innofactor MDRaaS and LMNTRIX differ in response capabilities?
Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Innofactor MDRaaS and included with LMNTRIX.
How does Innofactor MDRaaS pricing compare to LMNTRIX?
Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down..
Should I choose Innofactor MDRaaS or LMNTRIX?
Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.