Innofactor MDRaaS vs Kudelski Security
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Kudelski Security (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke... or Kudelski Security's technology-agnostic mdr with strong analyst recognition (gartner 8 years, forrester, bloor) and o....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel | Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC | Kudelski SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneSophosCarbon BlackCybereasonCisco Secure Endpoint Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. | Per-endpoint pricing, not based on data volume. Modular and all-in-one subscription options. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. | Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.. DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR. OT/ICS coverage requires the dedicated MDR for OT variant, priced separately. No public pricing at all. Enterprise positioning suggests premium cost. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom | Custom enterprise agreements |
| Channels | EmailPhonePortal | SlackPortalPhoneEmail |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Weeks. Starts with a business context assessment covering strategy, risk exposure, and likely threats. |
| Industry focus | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology | Critical InfrastructureEnergy & UtilitiesFinancial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentManufacturing (OT/ICS) |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as a specific number |
| MTTR | Not published | Less than 15 minutes on high-severity incidents (vendor-published, not independently validated) |
| Community view | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. | Well-recognized by analysts (Gartner 8 years running, Forrester Strong Performer, Bloor Champion) but almost invisible in community channels. Zero meaningful reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, no Reddit discussion. Enterprise and critical infrastructure buyers don't post much, which leaves a validation gap. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 | ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019SOC 2 Type IICyber Essentials (UK)UK G-Cloud |
| Certifications | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations | ISO 27001:2022 (certified since 2015)ISO 27017:2015 (certified since 2022)ISO 27018:2019 (certified since 2022)SOC 2 Type II (AICPA)Cyber Essentials (UK government scheme)UK G-Cloud (certified cloud security provider)Microsoft Solutions Partner (Security)Google Cloud Partner (MSSP)FIRST Membership (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams) |
| Founded | 2000 | 2012 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. | 12 months hot data. Unlimited ingestion, priced per endpoint rather than by data volume. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Innofactor MDRaaS and Kudelski Security?
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Innofactor MDRaaS covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kudelski Security.
How do Innofactor MDRaaS and Kudelski Security differ in response capabilities?
Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Kudelski Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Innofactor MDRaaS pricing compare to Kudelski Security?
Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. Kudelski Security pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization.. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Watch for with Kudelski Security: Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.; DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR.
Should I choose Innofactor MDRaaS or Kudelski Security?
Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Choose Kudelski Security if: mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement. Kudelski Security is not ideal for sMBs or budget-conscious buyers. No public pricing and enterprise positioning signals premium cost..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.