InfoGuard vs Todyl
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Todyl is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. InfoGuard is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform
- Price
- Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | TodylPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Todyl Endpoint Security (native, required, Elastic-based) |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Todyl Cloud-Managed SIEM (native) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Three-tier packaging (Essentials, Advanced, Complete) launched September 2025. Platform subscription starting at $250/month. Per-tier pricing not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE. $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier. EDR is Elastic-based, not Todyl proprietary, custom rules layer on top of Elastic |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackTeamsPortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | MSP/ChannelHealthcareGovernmentEducationFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | G2 4.6/5 (93 reviews). Software Finder 4.9/5 (14 reviews). PeerSpot listed but minimal reviews. MSP press is positive about tool consolidation. Limited independent buyer validation compared to established MDR vendors. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | SOC 2 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly)ISO 27001 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly) |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | – |
| Founded | 2001 | 2015 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Up to 5 years searchable SIEM storage (configurable by tier) |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Todyl?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Todyl is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do InfoGuard and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Todyl.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Todyl?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose InfoGuard or Todyl?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments (requires full Todyl stack adoption).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.