InfoGuard vs Stoik
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Stoik (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Stoik (Endpoint).
InfoGuard (Services firm) and Stoik (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or Stoik's stoik removes the friction of buying cyber insurance and mdr separately by bundling both for euro....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | StoikTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Bundled annual pricing combining cyber insurance and MDR. Price varies by company size, revenue, sector and coverage tier. Sold through 2,000+ broker partners only. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.. MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Sold through broker partners only. No direct purchase from Stoik.. Revenue cap: companies up to 1B EUR turnover (expanded from 750M EUR after CyberContract acquisition in September 2025). |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | CrowdStrike Falcon agent deployment, no minimum endpoint requirement published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Professional ServicesRetailManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Almost no English-language reviews. 10,000+ insured companies and 200%+ YoY growth show market traction in continental Europe. Backed by a16z, Munich Re Ventures and Alven (~$78M raised through Series C in Jan 2026). Practitioner sentiment on MDR quality is impossible to gauge from public sources. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | GDPR |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | – |
| Founded | 2001 | 2021 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Stoik?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Stoik is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Stoik.
How do InfoGuard and Stoik differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Stoik supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Stoik?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Stoik pricing: Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Stoik: Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.; MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Stoik?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Stoik if: european SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Stoik is not ideal for organizations needing active remediation or autonomous containment.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.