InfoGuard vs N-able
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. N-able is a MSP-channel that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; N-able serves SMB and Mid-market. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for N-able (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. N-able is a MSP-channel that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; N-able serves SMB and Mid-market. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for N-able (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
InfoGuard (Services firm) and N-able (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or N-able's unified security operations platform combining xdr, siem, soar, and ueba with vendor-agnostic mdr....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | MSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl |
| Price | Custom quote | MSP security bundle: $90-$275/user/mo; not Adlumin standalone |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Own agent required |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | $500,000 |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl
- Price
- MSP security bundle: $90-$275/user/mo; not Adlumin standalone
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- $500,000
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | N-ableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Built-in SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Third-party/MSP-channel estimate: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs. Exact Adlumin standalone pricing not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | $500,000 |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-user per-month pricing through MSP channel. Three tiers: MDR Base (identity-focused ITDR for M365 only), MDR Standard, MDR Advanced (adds 90-day retention). |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | MDR Base tier is identity-only (M365 ITDR). MDR Standard required for endpoint/network/cloud coverage.. Data retention upgrade (30 to 90 days) requires Advanced tier. Pricing designed for MSP channel. Direct enterprise pricing may differ or be unavailable.. N-able acquisition creates roadmap and integration uncertainty |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North AmericaEurope |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | 30 minutes deployment (vendor-claimed), 600+ hours of pre-built playbooks included |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcareLegalGovernmentManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | G2 4.8/5 and Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (3 reviews) show strong sentiment for customer support, ease of use, and platform features. Limited independent review data. MSP community reception to N-able acquisition is cautiously optimistic but creates integration uncertainty. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | HIPAAPCI DSSNISTGLBASOXFFIEC |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | – |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | 30 days (Standard), 90 days (Advanced tier) |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and N-able?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for N-able.
How do InfoGuard and N-able differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to N-able?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. N-able pricing: Third-party/MSP-channel estimate: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs. Exact Adlumin standalone pricing not published.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with N-able: MDR Base tier is identity-only (M365 ITDR). MDR Standard required for endpoint/network/cloud coverage.; Data retention upgrade (30 to 90 days) requires Advanced tier.
Should I choose InfoGuard or N-able?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure and direct vendor relationships (MSP-channel only).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.