InfoGuard vs Macquarie Government
InfoGuard and Macquarie Government are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard and Macquarie Government are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
InfoGuard offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). Macquarie Government may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | APAC |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language |
| Founded | 2001 | – |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Macquarie Government?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Macquarie Government.
How do InfoGuard and Macquarie Government differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Macquarie Government.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Macquarie Government?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Macquarie Government?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.