InfoGuard vs Integrity360
InfoGuard and Integrity360 are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Integrity360 serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
InfoGuard and Integrity360 are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Integrity360 serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | Integrity360TECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Custom quotes only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint pricing. No SIEM ingestion fees. Custom quotes based on environment size. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing. Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Extended log storage is an add-on, default retention period not published. The 1-hour response commitment requires a separate IR retainer purchase on top of the base MDR service |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeAfricaNorth America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Approximately 6 weeks for core MDR. Includes log source integration, detection rule tuning, and honeypot deployment. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentInsuranceRetailTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Gartner Representative Vendor in 5 Market Guides and holds SOC 2 Type II, CREST, and ISO 27001 certifications. Virtually no customer reviews exist on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights, making independent sentiment verification impossible. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST CSIRCREST Penetration Testing |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST Cyber Security Incident ResponseCREST Penetration TestingMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | 2001 | 2005 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published. Extended log storage available as add-on. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Integrity360?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Integrity360 is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do InfoGuard and Integrity360 differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Integrity360 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Integrity360?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Integrity360 pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Integrity360: Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing; Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately.
Should I choose InfoGuard or Integrity360?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Integrity360 if: european mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Integrity360 is not ideal for organizations wanting a single-vendor platform where EDR and MDR come from the same provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.