InfoGuard vs Innofactor MDRaaS
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Innofactor MDRaaS serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for Innofactor MDRaaS ().
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Innofactor MDRaaS serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for Innofactor MDRaaS ().
InfoGuard (Services firm) and Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Microsoft Sentinel cost depends on data ingestion, retention, analytics tiers and related Azure services.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Public Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations |
| Founded | 2001 | 2000 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Innofactor MDRaaS?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for Innofactor MDRaaS.
How do InfoGuard and Innofactor MDRaaS differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Innofactor MDRaaS.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Innofactor MDRaaS?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Innofactor MDRaaS?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.