Gradient Cyber vs Sattrix
Gradient Cyber is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Gradient Cyber targets Mid-market organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Gradient Cyber includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Gradient Cyber is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Gradient Cyber targets Mid-market organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Gradient Cyber includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Gradient Cyber (Pure-play MDR) and Sattrix (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Gradient Cyber's mid-market specialist that owns its platform, soc, and analyst team or Sattrix's sattrix mdr fits buyers that want a services-led provider for managed detection, threat hunting a....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Maritime and transportation organizations needing OT visibility alongside IT security | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Maritime and transportation organizations needing OT visibility alongside IT security
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Gradient CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne SingularityVMware Carbon BlackCisco Secure EndpointFortinet FortiEDRSophos CentralDeep Instinct | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Quorum AI native data lake (open XDR approach, works with or without customer SIEM) | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage areas. Positioned for mid-market budgets, but no public pricing available. | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing. You will need a custom quote and have no benchmark to negotiate against.. Network sensors may require on-premises hardware deployment. Ask about hardware costs.. Active containment (isolate, quarantine, kill) is included, but full incident response and forensics beyond containment may require a separate professional services engagement. Clarify exactly where that line is.. Monthly reviews only, not quarterly business reviews like some competitors offer. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management |
| Channels | EmailPortal | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | APAC |
| Onboarding | Days. Network sensors deploy quickly with minimal setup. Full deployment completed in less than a month. | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingGovernmentMaritime | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Limited public review volume. Gartner Peer Insights 4.2/5 with 13 reviews, very small market presence. Praise centers on communication quality, ease of deployment, and false positive reduction. Complaints focus on challenging ongoing management, limited customization, and gaps between sales promises and actual capabilities. No Reddit discussions found. | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAFIPS 140-2 | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (annual third-party audit, verified via GlobeNewsWire Dec 2023)ISO 27001 (vendor-claimed, not independently verified)GDPR compliant (vendor-claimed)HIPAA compliant (vendor-claimed)FIPS 140-2 (vendor-claimed, likely via AWS infrastructure) | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Data retention | Longer-term storage for threat hunting, forensics, and reporting (specific retention period not published) | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Gradient Cyber and Sattrix?
Gradient Cyber is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Gradient Cyber covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Sattrix.
How do Gradient Cyber and Sattrix differ in response capabilities?
Gradient Cyber supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Gradient Cyber and included with Sattrix.
How does Gradient Cyber pricing compare to Sattrix?
Gradient Cyber pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Sattrix pricing: Not published. Watch for with Gradient Cyber: No public pricing. You will need a custom quote and have no benchmark to negotiate against.; Network sensors may require on-premises hardware deployment. Ask about hardware costs.. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage..
Should I choose Gradient Cyber or Sattrix?
Choose Gradient Cyber if: mid-market organizations (200-2,000 employees) with limited security staff wanting 24x7 monitoring and active endpoint response without hiring a SOC. Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Gradient Cyber is not ideal for sMBs under 200 employees or large enterprises over 5,000 employees (outside mid-market focus). Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.