Foresite Cybersecurity vs Macnica
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Foresite Cybersecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Foresite Cybersecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Foresite Cybersecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Foresite Cybersecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Foresite Cybersecurity (Pure-play MDR) and Macnica (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Foresite Cybersecurity's google cloud secops specialist with deep chronicle siem and compliance automation expertise or Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Google Cloud-first organizations wanting deep Chronicle SIEM and SOAR integration from a dedicated Google partner | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | One-time deployment: from $25,000; MDR custom | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Google Cloud-first organizations wanting deep Chronicle SIEM and SOAR integration from a dedicated Google partner
- Price
- One-time deployment: from $25,000; MDR custom
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Foresite CybersecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeTaniumVMware Carbon BlackMicrosoft Defender | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Google Chronicle | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Vendor-published deployment packages start at $25,000. Ongoing MDR service pricing requires custom quote. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | + Optional | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on deployment complexity, data volume, and coverage scope. Three one-time deployment packages published on their website: Essential ($25K-$50K), Advanced ($50K-$100K), Security Transformation ($75K-$100K). Ongoing managed services pricing not published. | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Deployment packages ($25K-$100K) are one-time setup fees on top of ongoing MDR subscription, which is not publicly priced. Google Chronicle SIEM and SOAR licensing costs may be separate from Foresite's managed service fees -- clarify who holds the Chronicle license. Data ingestion costs scale with log volume on Chronicle platform, which can grow unpredictably. Specific response actions available through SOAR playbooks are not publicly documented -- ask exactly what containment actions they can execute. Single SOC site in Kansas means no geographic redundancy or follow-the-sun coverage | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North America | APAC |
| Onboarding | Three deployment tiers: Essential ($25K-$50K), Advanced ($50K-$100K), Security Transformation ($75K-$100K). All include onboarding, data ingestion, rule development, and training by Google-certified engineers. Security Transformation adds 30-60 day co-management period. | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentEducationManufacturing | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2020, top 10%). Clutch: 30 reviews with 100% satisfaction rate. Limited presence on Reddit, G2, or PeerSpot. Available feedback highlights strong technical support and effective communication. Small provider (~80-96 employees) with regional Kansas focus and heavy Google Cloud positioning means limited visibility outside the Google ecosystem. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IICMMCHIPAAPCI DSSNIST 800-53ISO 27001 | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIGoogle Cloud Premier Partner (Security Services Specialization)Google Cloud MSSP BadgeGoogle SecOps Delivery Partner | – |
| Founded | 2013 | – |
| Data retention | Per Chronicle SIEM retention policies, customer-configurable | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Foresite Cybersecurity and Macnica?
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Foresite Cybersecurity covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do Foresite Cybersecurity and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
Foresite Cybersecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Foresite Cybersecurity and not included with Macnica.
How does Foresite Cybersecurity pricing compare to Macnica?
Foresite Cybersecurity pricing: Vendor-published deployment packages start at $25,000. Ongoing MDR service pricing requires custom quote.. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with Foresite Cybersecurity: Deployment packages ($25K-$100K) are one-time setup fees on top of ongoing MDR subscription, which is not publicly priced; Google Chronicle SIEM and SOAR licensing costs may be separate from Foresite's managed service fees -- clarify who holds the Chronicle license. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose Foresite Cybersecurity or Macnica?
Choose Foresite Cybersecurity if: google Cloud-first organizations wanting deep Chronicle SIEM and SOAR integration from a dedicated Google partner. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Foresite Cybersecurity is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without human approval loops. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.