Eviden vs InfoGuard
Eviden and InfoGuard are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Eviden targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Eviden includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Eviden and InfoGuard are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Eviden targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Eviden includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Eviden offers broader coverage (6 surfaces vs. 4). InfoGuard may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European and Middle East enterprises wanting a regional services-firm MDR with deep on-the-ground presence | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European and Middle East enterprises wanting a regional services-firm MDR with deep on-the-ground presence
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | EvidenTECH-AGNOSTIC | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneTrend Micro | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunkIBM QRadarGoogle Chronicle | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote, negotiated with the regional team. Fully managed and co-managed tiers. Sold direct. | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing varies by region with no public benchmarks, expect long sales cycles. Atos Group is mid-restructuring under the Genesis plan, watch contract terms around continuity. AIsaac value depends on telemetry sitting in Amazon Security Lake or compatible data fabric, your data architecture choice changes pricing | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth AmericaAsia-PacificMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesPublic SectorEnergyManufacturingDefenseHealthcare | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Eviden has a Gartner Peer Insights MDR vendor profile and analyst recognition but limited grassroots community coverage on Reddit and G2. Buyer perception is shaped more by Atos Group news (Genesis transformation plan, Tech Foundations sale, French State HPC offer) than by independent customer reviews of the MDR service itself. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | Not published | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | Not published | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2023 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not published | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Eviden and InfoGuard?
Eviden is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Eviden covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for InfoGuard.
How do Eviden and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
Eviden supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Eviden pricing compare to InfoGuard?
Eviden pricing: Not published. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with Eviden: Pricing varies by region with no public benchmarks, expect long sales cycles; Atos Group is mid-restructuring under the Genesis plan, watch contract terms around continuity. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose Eviden or InfoGuard?
Choose Eviden if: european and Middle East enterprises wanting a regional services-firm MDR with deep on-the-ground presence. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Eviden is not ideal for sMB and lower mid-market buyers who need fast-onboarding pure-play MDR. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.