Ensign InfoSecurity vs SISA ProACT
Ensign InfoSecurity and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ensign InfoSecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
Ensign InfoSecurity and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ensign InfoSecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Ensign InfoSecurity offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Ensign InfoSecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Cybereason | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage scope. IR retainer is separate: Essentials (USD 2,000/year, 10 hours), Standard (100-hour blocks), or Ad-hoc. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.. 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Pricing requires custom quote. No published per-endpoint or per-user rates for comparison shopping.. Cybereason EDR is the default platform. Unclear what the cost or support impact is if you use a different EDR vendor.. Ad-hoc IR retainer has no upfront cost but standard-priced manhours and longer onboarding. You pay more per hour in a crisis. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-Pacific | |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingTechnology | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250: top 10 globally and #1 in APAC for the fourth consecutive year (2025 list). No G2 or PeerSpot product reviews found. Glassdoor employee reviews average 3.4/5 (268 reviews). Industry recognition is strong within APAC, but almost zero practitioner discussion outside the region. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001PCI DSS | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001PCI DSSOSPAR (SOC attestation) | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2018 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Ensign InfoSecurity and SISA ProACT?
Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Ensign InfoSecurity covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do Ensign InfoSecurity and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
Ensign InfoSecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Ensign InfoSecurity pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
Ensign InfoSecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with Ensign InfoSecurity: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.; 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose Ensign InfoSecurity or SISA ProACT?
Choose Ensign InfoSecurity if: mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. Ensign InfoSecurity is not ideal for north American or European organizations without APAC operations. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.