Ensign InfoSecurity vs Sattrix
Ensign InfoSecurity and Sattrix are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Ensign InfoSecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Ensign InfoSecurity and Sattrix are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Ensign InfoSecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Ensign InfoSecurity offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 2). Sattrix may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Ensign InfoSecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Cybereason | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage scope. IR retainer is separate: Essentials (USD 2,000/year, 10 hours), Standard (100-hour blocks), or Ad-hoc. | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.. 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Pricing requires custom quote. No published per-endpoint or per-user rates for comparison shopping.. Cybereason EDR is the default platform. Unclear what the cost or support impact is if you use a different EDR vendor.. Ad-hoc IR retainer has no upfront cost but standard-priced manhours and longer onboarding. You pay more per hour in a crisis. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-Pacific | APAC |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250: top 10 globally and #1 in APAC for the fourth consecutive year (2025 list). No G2 or PeerSpot product reviews found. Glassdoor employee reviews average 3.4/5 (268 reviews). Industry recognition is strong within APAC, but almost zero practitioner discussion outside the region. | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001PCI DSS | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA |
| Certifications | ISO 27001PCI DSSOSPAR (SOC attestation) | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Data retention | Not published | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Ensign InfoSecurity and Sattrix?
Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Ensign InfoSecurity covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Sattrix.
How do Ensign InfoSecurity and Sattrix differ in response capabilities?
Ensign InfoSecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Ensign InfoSecurity and included with Sattrix.
How does Ensign InfoSecurity pricing compare to Sattrix?
Ensign InfoSecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Sattrix pricing: Not published. Watch for with Ensign InfoSecurity: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.; 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage..
Should I choose Ensign InfoSecurity or Sattrix?
Choose Ensign InfoSecurity if: mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC. Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Ensign InfoSecurity is not ideal for north American or European organizations without APAC operations. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.