e2e-assure vs Performanta
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. e2e-assure includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. e2e-assure includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
e2e-assure (Pure-play MDR) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize e2e-assure's uk-focused mdr with sc-cleared analysts and deep microsoft expertise, purpose-built for critical ... or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts
- Price
- AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | e2e-assureTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCrowdStrikeSentinelOneTrend Micro Vision One | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month pricing. Two tiers: Monitored (baseline Defender coverage, monthly reports) and Managed (extended functionality, automated threat responses, Teams-based monthly reviews). Contracts typically 12-36 months. Also available as committed annual contract with retrospective monthly management charge based on device count. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.. Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Minimum spend threshold exists but is not publicly disclosed. Ask for it before engaging.. OT/ICS and advanced cloud coverage may be priced as additional modules beyond base MDR.. Managed tier costs more than Monitored, with significantly different automation and analyst involvement. Clarify which tier is being quoted. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, 2-year, 3-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | TeamsEmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAsia-Pacific | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Weeks, varies by integration complexity and environment scope | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical National InfrastructureManufacturingDefenseUtilitiesLife Sciences | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NPS score of 88+ (vendor-reported, industry average 34) suggests high customer satisfaction among existing clients. However, virtually no public reviews on G2, Gartner, or Reddit exist, making independent validation impossible. Customers appear to value SC clearance and UK/government compliance focus. Small enough provider that community discussion is minimal. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials PlusG-Cloud 14CCS Framework | – |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials Plus | – |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between e2e-assure and Performanta?
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: e2e-assure offers ≤1 hour, Performanta offers Not disclosed. e2e-assure covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do e2e-assure and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
e2e-assure supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does e2e-assure pricing compare to Performanta?
e2e-assure pricing: Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published.. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with e2e-assure: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.; Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose e2e-assure or Performanta?
Choose e2e-assure if: uK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. e2e-assure is not ideal for organizations needing full hands-on remediation (e2e-assure automates containment but guides remediation). Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.