e2e-assure vs Macnica
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. e2e-assure includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. e2e-assure includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
e2e-assure (Pure-play MDR) and Macnica (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize e2e-assure's uk-focused mdr with sc-cleared analysts and deep microsoft expertise, purpose-built for critical ... or Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts
- Price
- AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | e2e-assureTECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCrowdStrikeSentinelOneTrend Micro Vision One | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunk | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month pricing. Two tiers: Monitored (baseline Defender coverage, monthly reports) and Managed (extended functionality, automated threat responses, Teams-based monthly reviews). Contracts typically 12-36 months. Also available as committed annual contract with retrospective monthly management charge based on device count. | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.. Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Minimum spend threshold exists but is not publicly disclosed. Ask for it before engaging.. OT/ICS and advanced cloud coverage may be priced as additional modules beyond base MDR.. Managed tier costs more than Monitored, with significantly different automation and analyst involvement. Clarify which tier is being quoted. | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, 2-year, 3-year | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | TeamsEmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAsia-Pacific | APAC |
| Onboarding | Weeks, varies by integration complexity and environment scope | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical National InfrastructureManufacturingDefenseUtilitiesLife Sciences | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NPS score of 88+ (vendor-reported, industry average 34) suggests high customer satisfaction among existing clients. However, virtually no public reviews on G2, Gartner, or Reddit exist, making independent validation impossible. Customers appear to value SC clearance and UK/government compliance focus. Small enough provider that community discussion is minimal. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials PlusG-Cloud 14CCS Framework | – |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials Plus | – |
| Founded | 2013 | – |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between e2e-assure and Macnica?
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: e2e-assure offers ≤1 hour, Macnica offers Not disclosed. e2e-assure covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do e2e-assure and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
e2e-assure supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does e2e-assure pricing compare to Macnica?
e2e-assure pricing: Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published.. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with e2e-assure: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.; Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose e2e-assure or Macnica?
Choose e2e-assure if: uK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. e2e-assure is not ideal for organizations needing full hands-on remediation (e2e-assure automates containment but guides remediation). Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.