DTS Solution vs Quorum Cyber
DTS Solution is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Quorum Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
DTS Solution is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Quorum Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
DTS Solution (Services firm) and Quorum Cyber (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DTS Solution's dts hawkeye is a useful regional option for buyers that want managed csoc, xdr, threat hunting an... or Quorum Cyber's the strongest microsoft-native mdr option with a tiered model spanning smb to enterprise, backed ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider | SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DTS SolutionTECH-AGNOSTIC | Quorum CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft endpoint securityHawkEye XDR AgentCustomer endpoint security tools | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | HawkEye NG-SIEMHawkEye Open XDRCustomer-owned SIEM | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Contact for custom quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered subscription packages by log-source count and EPS, with custom-tailored packages for additional log sources, EPS and retention. Public prices are not published. | Not published. Described as 'flexible subscription model' with pricing based on environment size and risk profile. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. DFIR is included only in Premium Platinum in the package table; lower tiers list it as an add-on.. Managed SOAR and many adjacent managed services are add-ons rather than guaranteed base MDR scope.. The public AI SOC page says response actions are analyst-approved, so buyers should document which containment actions DTS can execute and whose approval is required. | Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.. Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably.. Identity coverage (ITDR) and data security (Clarity Data) are separate services at lower tiers. AWS and GCP coverage only available in Clarity Protect (top tier) |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Lite Bronze, Baseline Silver, Advanced Gold, Premium Platinum, Custom-tailored package | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | MEA | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | HawkEye describes an onsite discovery workshop, package selection, secure onboarding, service delivery and secure offboarding. No standard calendar timeline was found. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Critical InfrastructureEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingGovernmentFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetailTechnologyTelecommunicationsSmart CitiesTransportation | Financial ServicesEducationPublic SectorManufacturingProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | HawkEye has strong vendor-controlled detail for package tiers, dashboard access, retention, CSOC/XDR capabilities and regional SOC positioning, but little independent MDR-specific review signal in public English-language communities. Buyers should validate analyst quality, response authority and pricing through references. | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR as Representative Vendor (2024, 2025). Microsoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025. First UK Microsoft Verified MXDR provider. Very limited independent review data: no ratings on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights with sufficient reviews. Zero Reddit presence. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type IMITRE ATT&CK | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type I logo shown on DTS siteSOC-CMM risk-driven certification logo shown on DTS siteSWIFT CSP logo shown on DTS site | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 (UKAS-level audit)CREST (Vulnerability Assessment, Pen Testing, CSIR)Cyber EssentialsMicrosoft Verified MXDR SolutionMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025Gartner Market Guide for MDR Representative Vendor (2024, 2025) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| Data retention | HawkEye package pages publish 3 months hot storage, 6 months warm storage and 12 months cold storage across service tiers, with longer retention available through a custom-tailored package. Advanced and Premium tier pages also describe standard collected-log retention; buyers should reconcile final retention language in the contract. | Data resides in customer's own Microsoft Sentinel instance / Azure tenant. Retention governed by customer's Azure configuration. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DTS Solution and Quorum Cyber?
DTS Solution is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DTS Solution covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Quorum Cyber.
How do DTS Solution and Quorum Cyber differ in response capabilities?
DTS Solution supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Quorum Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does DTS Solution pricing compare to Quorum Cyber?
DTS Solution pricing: Not published. Quorum Cyber pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Watch for with DTS Solution: Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. Watch for with Quorum Cyber: Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.; Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably..
Should I choose DTS Solution or Quorum Cyber?
Choose DTS Solution if: middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider. Choose Quorum Cyber if: microsoft-committed organizations (E3/E5) wanting MDR built natively on Sentinel and Defender with data staying in their own Azure tenant. DTS Solution is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual MTTD/MTTR before sales. Quorum Cyber is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or any non-Microsoft primary EDR. Quorum Cyber is Microsoft-only..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.