DTS Solution vs NTT Security Holdings
DTS Solution and NTT Security Holdings are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while NTT Security Holdings serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for NTT Security Holdings (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Buyer brief
DTS Solution and NTT Security Holdings are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while NTT Security Holdings serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for NTT Security Holdings (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
NTT Security Holdings offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 3). DTS Solution may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider | Global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage across NA, Europe, and APAC |
| Price | Custom quote | SamurAI XDR SaaS: $3.33/endpoint/mo; MDR custom |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage across NA, Europe, and APAC
- Price
- SamurAI XDR SaaS: $3.33/endpoint/mo; MDR custom
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DTS SolutionTECH-AGNOSTIC | NTT Security HoldingsTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft endpoint securityHawkEye XDR AgentCustomer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrike Falcon InsightMicrosoft Defender for EndpointVMware Carbon Black CloudFortinet FortiEDRTrellix Endpoint Security |
| SIEM integrations | HawkEye NG-SIEMHawkEye Open XDRCustomer-owned SIEM | Fortinet FortiAnalyzer |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | Isolate |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. MDR is custom quoted. Vendor-published SamurAI XDR SaaS (self-service, not MDR): $3.33/endpoint/month. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | ≤30 minutes |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered subscription packages by log-source count and EPS, with custom-tailored packages for additional log sources, EPS and retention. Public prices are not published. | Custom quoted based on environment size, coverage areas, and service components. Note: SamurAI XDR SaaS (a self-service product, not MDR) is $3.33/endpoint/month. MDR pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. DFIR is included only in Premium Platinum in the package table; lower tiers list it as an add-on.. Managed SOAR and many adjacent managed services are add-ons rather than guaranteed base MDR scope.. The public AI SOC page says response actions are analyst-approved, so buyers should document which containment actions DTS can execute and whose approval is required. | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Requires a separate retainer with separate pricing.. SamurAI Endpoint Agent and Network Traffic Analyzer are add-ons, not included in base service. Clarify which components are in your quote.. Gartner reviewers consistently cite NTT as expensive relative to competitors.. Alert severity over-classification reported by customers, leading to unnecessary after-hours calls for already-blocked threats.. New log source integrations can take significant development time according to customer reviews.. Analysis quality and portal flexibility vary by SOC region per Gartner feedback. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Lite Bronze, Baseline Silver, Advanced Gold, Premium Platinum, Custom-tailored package | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | MEA | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | HawkEye describes an onsite discovery workshop, package selection, secure onboarding, service delivery and secure offboarding. No standard calendar timeline was found. | Official docs show ~16 days (2-day portal activation, 14-day orientation). NTT markets 'less than one week' but typical deployments are longer. |
| Industry focus | Critical InfrastructureEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingGovernmentFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetailTechnologyTelecommunicationsSmart CitiesTransportation | ManufacturingIndustrialFinancial ServicesEnergyHealthcareGovernmentTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | HawkEye has strong vendor-controlled detail for package tiers, dashboard access, retention, CSOC/XDR capabilities and regional SOC positioning, but little independent MDR-specific review signal in public English-language communities. Buyers should validate analyst quality, response authority and pricing through references. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.4/5 (21 reviews). NTT DATA (parent group) ranked second by revenue in Gartner Market Share Analysis for Managed Security Services Worldwide 2022. Reviewers praise responsiveness, team continuity, and global reach. Recurring complaints: expensive pricing, alert severity over-classification, and inconsistent analysis quality across SOC regions. Very limited Reddit/community discussion. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type IMITRE ATT&CK | ISO 27001SOC 2 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type I logo shown on DTS siteSOC-CMM risk-driven certification logo shown on DTS siteSWIFT CSP logo shown on DTS site | ISO 27001SOC 2ISAE 3000 |
| Founded | 2011 | 2000 |
| Data retention | HawkEye package pages publish 3 months hot storage, 6 months warm storage and 12 months cold storage across service tiers, with longer retention available through a custom-tailored package. Advanced and Premium tier pages also describe standard collected-log retention; buyers should reconcile final retention language in the contract. | 12 months standard retention for security incident data |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DTS Solution and NTT Security Holdings?
DTS Solution is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NTT Security Holdings is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: DTS Solution offers Not disclosed, NTT Security Holdings offers ≤30 minutes. DTS Solution covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for NTT Security Holdings.
How do DTS Solution and NTT Security Holdings differ in response capabilities?
DTS Solution supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. NTT Security Holdings supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does DTS Solution pricing compare to NTT Security Holdings?
DTS Solution pricing: Not published. NTT Security Holdings pricing: Not published. MDR is custom quoted. Vendor-published SamurAI XDR SaaS (self-service, not MDR): $3.33/endpoint/month.. Watch for with DTS Solution: Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. Watch for with NTT Security Holdings: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Requires a separate retainer with separate pricing.; SamurAI Endpoint Agent and Network Traffic Analyzer are add-ons, not included in base service. Clarify which components are in your quote..
Should I choose DTS Solution or NTT Security Holdings?
Choose DTS Solution if: middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider. Choose NTT Security Holdings if: global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage across NA, Europe, and APAC. DTS Solution is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual MTTD/MTTR before sales. NTT Security Holdings is not ideal for sMBs wanting transparent pricing and self-service onboarding.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.