DTS Solution vs Mandiant
DTS Solution and Mandiant are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Mandiant serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Mandiant (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
DTS Solution and Mandiant are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Mandiant serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Mandiant (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Mandiant offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 3). DTS Solution may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider | Enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts |
| Price | Custom quote | Mandiant software benchmark: ~$83K/yr; not Managed Defense |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts
- Price
- Mandiant software benchmark: ~$83K/yr; not Managed Defense
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DTS SolutionTECH-AGNOSTIC | MandiantTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft endpoint securityHawkEye XDR AgentCustomer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne Singularity |
| SIEM integrations | HawkEye NG-SIEMHawkEye Open XDRCustomer-owned SIEM | Google Security Operations (native integration) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Third-party buyer data reports an average Mandiant software cost around $83,000/year. Treat this as a Mandiant buyer benchmark, not a clean Managed Defense MDR quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered subscription packages by log-source count and EPS, with custom-tailored packages for additional log sources, EPS and retention. Public prices are not published. | Custom enterprise subscription pricing. Factors: users, data volume, features, contract terms. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. DFIR is included only in Premium Platinum in the package table; lower tiers list it as an add-on.. Managed SOAR and many adjacent managed services are add-ons rather than guaranteed base MDR scope.. The public AI SOC page says response actions are analyst-approved, so buyers should document which containment actions DTS can execute and whose approval is required. | ~$83K+/year estimated, premium enterprise pricing. IR retainer is separate and must be purchased independently for full incident response. Managed Defense for Google SecOps currently GA in US only, international customers face limitations |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Lite Bronze, Baseline Silver, Advanced Gold, Premium Platinum, Custom-tailored package | Custom enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | MEA | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | HawkEye describes an onsite discovery workshop, package selection, secure onboarding, service delivery and secure offboarding. No standard calendar timeline was found. | 4-8 weeks typical for enterprise deployments |
| Industry focus | Critical InfrastructureEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingGovernmentFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetailTechnologyTelecommunicationsSmart CitiesTransportation | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernment (Federal)DefenseCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not formally published. Claims alerts triaged by expert within minutes. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not formally published. Claims response in minutes, not hours. Participated in 2020 MITRE ATT&CK evaluation (APT29) with one of the highest enriched alert counts in the MSSP detection category. |
| Community view | HawkEye has strong vendor-controlled detail for package tiers, dashboard access, retention, CSOC/XDR capabilities and regional SOC positioning, but little independent MDR-specific review signal in public English-language communities. Buyers should validate analyst quality, response authority and pricing through references. | Mandiant brand is synonymous with threat intelligence and incident response. TrustRadius 6.9/10 (11 reviews). PeerSpot 8.4/10 (Mandiant Advantage, not MDR-specific). Limited public reviews for Managed Defense specifically. Primary criticism: premium pricing, dashboard complexity, and IR being a separate retainer despite Mandiant's IR reputation. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type IMITRE ATT&CK | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018FedRAMP HighPCI DSSGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type I logo shown on DTS siteSOC-CMM risk-driven certification logo shown on DTS siteSWIFT CSP logo shown on DTS site | SOC 2 Type II (via Google Cloud)ISO 27001 (via Google Cloud)FedRAMP High P-ATO (Google Cloud infrastructure, 150+ services). Mandiant Advantage Automated Defense is FedRAMP Ready at High Impact Level (2022).ISO 27017 (via Google Cloud)ISO 27018 (via Google Cloud) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2004 |
| Data retention | HawkEye package pages publish 3 months hot storage, 6 months warm storage and 12 months cold storage across service tiers, with longer retention available through a custom-tailored package. Advanced and Premium tier pages also describe standard collected-log retention; buyers should reconcile final retention language in the contract. | Per-contract basis. Google Cloud data residency options available. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DTS Solution and Mandiant?
DTS Solution is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DTS Solution covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Mandiant.
How do DTS Solution and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
DTS Solution supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does DTS Solution pricing compare to Mandiant?
DTS Solution pricing: Not published. Mandiant pricing: Third-party buyer data reports an average Mandiant software cost around $83,000/year. Treat this as a Mandiant buyer benchmark, not a clean Managed Defense MDR quote.. Watch for with DTS Solution: Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated, premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate and must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose DTS Solution or Mandiant?
Choose DTS Solution if: middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts. DTS Solution is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual MTTD/MTTR before sales. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations (~$83K+/year estimated pricing).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.