DTS Solution vs LRQA Nettitude
DTS Solution and LRQA Nettitude are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while LRQA Nettitude serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for LRQA Nettitude (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
DTS Solution and LRQA Nettitude are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while LRQA Nettitude serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for LRQA Nettitude (Endpoint, Network).
DTS Solution offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 2). LRQA Nettitude may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider | UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DTS SolutionTECH-AGNOSTIC | LRQA NettitudeTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft endpoint securityHawkEye XDR AgentCustomer endpoint security tools | Microsoft DefenderEndpoint Detection and Response tools |
| SIEM integrations | HawkEye NG-SIEMHawkEye Open XDRCustomer-owned SIEM | Microsoft SentinelCrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEMCloud SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered subscription packages by log-source count and EPS, with custom-tailored packages for additional log sources, EPS and retention. Public prices are not published. | Custom pricing. Public LRQA pages do not publish MDR price bands or standard per-endpoint, per-user or per-GB pricing for the MDR service. Because MDR, SOC-as-a-Service, XDR, EDR, NDR, vulnerability management and incident response are described as a modular portfolio, buyers should confirm exactly what is in the quoted scope. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. DFIR is included only in Premium Platinum in the package table; lower tiers list it as an add-on.. Managed SOAR and many adjacent managed services are add-ons rather than guaranteed base MDR scope.. The public AI SOC page says response actions are analyst-approved, so buyers should document which containment actions DTS can execute and whose approval is required. | Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.. Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Physical SOC location, data residency and raw log export terms should be confirmed in writing. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Lite Bronze, Baseline Silver, Advanced Gold, Premium Platinum, Custom-tailored package | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | MEA | |
| Onboarding | HawkEye describes an onsite discovery workshop, package selection, secure onboarding, service delivery and secure offboarding. No standard calendar timeline was found. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Critical InfrastructureEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingGovernmentFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetailTechnologyTelecommunicationsSmart CitiesTransportation | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTechnologyEnergyManufacturingTransportationRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | HawkEye has strong vendor-controlled detail for package tiers, dashboard access, retention, CSOC/XDR capabilities and regional SOC positioning, but little independent MDR-specific review signal in public English-language communities. Buyers should validate analyst quality, response authority and pricing through references. | LRQA Nettitude has strong accreditation evidence, but public buyer-review signal for the MDR service itself is thin. G2's seller profile shows 3.8/5 across two Nettitude reviews, and they are not MDR-specific. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type IMITRE ATT&CK | ISO 27001PCI DSSNCSC CIRCRESTCyber EssentialsDORANIST CSFSOC 2 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type I logo shown on DTS siteSOC-CMM risk-driven certification logo shown on DTS siteSWIFT CSP logo shown on DTS site | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCREST Red TeamingCREST Incident ResponseCREST Threat IntelligenceNCSC Cyber Incident Response Assured Service ProviderMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | 2011 | 2003 |
| Data retention | HawkEye package pages publish 3 months hot storage, 6 months warm storage and 12 months cold storage across service tiers, with longer retention available through a custom-tailored package. Advanced and Premium tier pages also describe standard collected-log retention; buyers should reconcile final retention language in the contract. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DTS Solution and LRQA Nettitude?
DTS Solution is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DTS Solution covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for LRQA Nettitude.
How do DTS Solution and LRQA Nettitude differ in response capabilities?
DTS Solution supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. LRQA Nettitude supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DTS Solution pricing compare to LRQA Nettitude?
DTS Solution pricing: Not published. LRQA Nettitude pricing: Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with DTS Solution: Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. Watch for with LRQA Nettitude: Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.; Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments..
Should I choose DTS Solution or LRQA Nettitude?
Choose DTS Solution if: middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider. Choose LRQA Nettitude if: uK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR. DTS Solution is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual MTTD/MTTR before sales. LRQA Nettitude is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.