DOT Security vs SISA ProACT
DOT Security and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
DOT Security and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
DOT Security offers broader coverage (1 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DOT SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote. No public price bands found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. DOT does not publish endpoint, user, device or package pricing for MDR. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.. No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Public materials emphasize customized stack design, which can make quotes harder to compare against per-endpoint MDR products.. Specific response actions and approval rules are not published. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | DOT says every relationship begins with a cybersecurity risk audit or gap analysis, followed by stack design, deployment and ongoing management. No standard MDR onboarding timeline was found. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HospitalityHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentConstructionFinancial Services | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | DOT Security has a current vendor-controlled MDR signal through its endpoint security page and a clear U.S.-based SOC story. Independent MDR review volume was not found in this pass, so buyer diligence should rely on references, a proof of value and careful quote scoping. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | HIPAACMMCNISTCCPAGDPR | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | – | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2020 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DOT Security and SISA ProACT?
DOT Security is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DOT Security covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do DOT Security and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
DOT Security supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DOT Security pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
DOT Security pricing: Custom quote. No public price bands found.. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with DOT Security: DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.; No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose DOT Security or SISA ProACT?
Choose DOT Security if: sMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. DOT Security is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing, named EDR support or published detection metrics. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.