DOT Security vs Macquarie Government
DOT Security and Macquarie Government are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
DOT Security and Macquarie Government are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Macquarie Government offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). DOT Security may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DOT SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote. No public price bands found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. DOT does not publish endpoint, user, device or package pricing for MDR. | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.. No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Public materials emphasize customized stack design, which can make quotes harder to compare against per-endpoint MDR products.. Specific response actions and approval rules are not published. | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | APAC |
| Onboarding | DOT says every relationship begins with a cybersecurity risk audit or gap analysis, followed by stack design, deployment and ongoing management. No standard MDR onboarding timeline was found. | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. |
| Industry focus | HospitalityHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentConstructionFinancial Services | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | DOT Security has a current vendor-controlled MDR signal through its endpoint security page and a clear U.S.-based SOC story. Independent MDR review volume was not found in this pass, so buyer diligence should rely on references, a proof of value and careful quote scoping. | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. |
| Compliance | HIPAACMMCNISTCCPAGDPR | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP |
| Certifications | – | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language |
| Founded | 2020 | – |
| Data retention | Not published | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DOT Security and Macquarie Government?
DOT Security is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DOT Security covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Macquarie Government.
How do DOT Security and Macquarie Government differ in response capabilities?
DOT Security supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does DOT Security pricing compare to Macquarie Government?
DOT Security pricing: Custom quote. No public price bands found.. Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Watch for with DOT Security: DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.; No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose DOT Security or Macquarie Government?
Choose DOT Security if: sMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance. Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. DOT Security is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing, named EDR support or published detection metrics. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.