DOT Security vs Macnica
DOT Security and Macnica are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
DOT Security and Macnica are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Macnica offers broader coverage (2 surfaces vs. 1). DOT Security may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DOT SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote. No public price bands found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | + Optional | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. DOT does not publish endpoint, user, device or package pricing for MDR. | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.. No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Public materials emphasize customized stack design, which can make quotes harder to compare against per-endpoint MDR products.. Specific response actions and approval rules are not published. | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | APAC |
| Onboarding | DOT says every relationship begins with a cybersecurity risk audit or gap analysis, followed by stack design, deployment and ongoing management. No standard MDR onboarding timeline was found. | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | HospitalityHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentConstructionFinancial Services | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | DOT Security has a current vendor-controlled MDR signal through its endpoint security page and a clear U.S.-based SOC story. Independent MDR review volume was not found in this pass, so buyer diligence should rely on references, a proof of value and careful quote scoping. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | HIPAACMMCNISTCCPAGDPR | – |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | 2020 | – |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DOT Security and Macnica?
DOT Security is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DOT Security covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do DOT Security and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
DOT Security supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does DOT Security pricing compare to Macnica?
DOT Security pricing: Custom quote. No public price bands found.. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with DOT Security: DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.; No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose DOT Security or Macnica?
Choose DOT Security if: sMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. DOT Security is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing, named EDR support or published detection metrics. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.