Devoteam vs Hitachi Cyber
Devoteam and Hitachi Cyber are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Hitachi Cyber serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Devoteam includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud, Identity), compared to 6 for Hitachi Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Buyer brief
Devoteam and Hitachi Cyber are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Hitachi Cyber serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Devoteam includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud, Identity), compared to 6 for Hitachi Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Hitachi Cyber offers broader coverage (6 surfaces vs. 2). Devoteam may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm | Existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DevoteamTECH-AGNOSTIC | Hitachi CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft security toolsCustomer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platformsGoogle Security Operations Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkGoogle Chronicle Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote for cloud managed services and managed security. Public MDR prices are not published. | Custom quote, not published. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. The service is cloud-centered; teams seeking a packaged endpoint MDR with named containment actions should validate endpoint tooling and response scope.. Devoteam has separate cloud, cybersecurity, Microsoft, AWS and Google Cloud offerings, so scope boundaries between MDR, cloud managed services and advisory work should be written into the contract.. Offboarding terms for SIEM detections, automation scripts, reports and retained logs are not described publicly. | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. OT coverage routes through the new Krakow SOC and may change response timing if your assets sit elsewhere. Services span MDR, MSS and consulting under one roof, scope creep into adjacent services is easy |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom cloud managed services engagement, Managed Security, Cloud Managed Services, Managed Detection and Response | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Devoteam describes SIEM platform design and implementation, Infrastructure as Code deployment and managed cloud/security operations, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. | Not published |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailTelecommunicationsManufacturingPublic SectorHealthcare | Financial ServicesEnergyManufacturingTransportationHealthcarePublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Devoteam has solid vendor-controlled evidence for cloud MDR, 24x7 monitoring, Sentinel-centered SIEM operations, SOAR automation and multi-cloud security partnerships. Independent MDR-specific buyer reviews are limited, so buyers should validate SOC delivery quality, response authority, cloud log costs and actual managed-service boundaries through references. | Hitachi Cyber has limited public review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most independent coverage focuses on the Hitachi corporate parent or Above Security heritage rather than current customer experience. Buyers will need to lean on direct references. |
| Compliance | GDPRPCI DSSANSSICloud Security AllianceISO | ISO 9001 (MSS)PCI QSA (Canada, US, LATAM, Caribbean)FIRST member |
| Certifications | AWS Premier Consulting PartnerAWS Managed Services ProviderGoogle Cloud Diamond PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Security Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Security Services Specialized partnerMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Azure Expert MSP | ISO 9001PCI QSAFIRST |
| Founded | – | 1999 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Devoteam describes outsourced SIEM platform operations and cloud-managed services, but public pages do not publish default log retention, hot/warm storage or export terms. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Devoteam and Hitachi Cyber?
Devoteam is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Hitachi Cyber is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Devoteam covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for Hitachi Cyber.
How do Devoteam and Hitachi Cyber differ in response capabilities?
Devoteam supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Hitachi Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Devoteam and included with Hitachi Cyber.
How does Devoteam pricing compare to Hitachi Cyber?
Devoteam pricing: Not published. Hitachi Cyber pricing: Not published. Watch for with Devoteam: Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. Watch for with Hitachi Cyber: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; OT coverage routes through the new Krakow SOC and may change response timing if your assets sit elsewhere.
Should I choose Devoteam or Hitachi Cyber?
Choose Devoteam if: european and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm. Choose Hitachi Cyber if: existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with. Devoteam is not ideal for buyers that require public per-endpoint MDR pricing before sales engagement. Hitachi Cyber is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments or independently validated detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.