DefenseStorm vs SISA ProACT
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DefenseStorm includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DefenseStorm includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
DefenseStorm (Platform vendor) and SISA ProACT (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DefenseStorm's defensestorm is a strong vertical mdr candidate for u.s or SISA ProACT's sisa proact fits payment-sector buyers that want mdr tied to forensics, pci expertise and ai-assi....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefenseStormTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeCarbon BlackOther EDR options supported through customer-specific integration | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | GRID ActiveCustomer security logs and event sources | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Predictable employee-count-based pricing with unlimited data ingestion, according to current vendor homepage copy. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.. Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. No public contractual SLA table or service-credit terms were found despite published performance metrics.. Pricing varies by institution size, coverage tier and product mix, but no public price bands or minimums are disclosed. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | ||
| Onboarding | G2 lists average time to implement as 1 month. Vendor site does not publish a standard MDR onboarding SLA. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesBankingCredit Unions | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | <15 minutes mean time to detect across the customer base (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| MTTR | <24 hours mean time to respond (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | G2 shows 4.8/5 across 29 reviews, with reviewers concentrated in banking and financial services and G2 category filters including MDR and EDR. Review themes are positive around customer support, team quality, onboarding and ease of use. Negative themes include querying/log complexity, asset discovery and navigation/reporting friction. Public Reddit signal was not meaningful in this pass. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | FFIECGLBANCUANIST CSFCRI Profile | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | – | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. DefenseStorm publishes GRID Active self-service restore/data retention content, but public retention terms were not found. | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DefenseStorm and SISA ProACT?
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DefenseStorm covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do DefenseStorm and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
DefenseStorm supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DefenseStorm pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
DefenseStorm pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with DefenseStorm: DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.; Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose DefenseStorm or SISA ProACT?
Choose DefenseStorm if: u.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. DefenseStorm is not ideal for organizations outside U.S. banks and credit unions. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.