DefenseStorm vs Performanta
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
DefenseStorm (Platform vendor) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DefenseStorm's defensestorm is a strong vertical mdr candidate for u.s or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefenseStormTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeCarbon BlackOther EDR options supported through customer-specific integration Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | GRID ActiveCustomer security logs and event sources | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Predictable employee-count-based pricing with unlimited data ingestion, according to current vendor homepage copy. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.. Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. No public contractual SLA table or service-credit terms were found despite published performance metrics.. Pricing varies by institution size, coverage tier and product mix, but no public price bands or minimums are disclosed. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | |
| Onboarding | G2 lists average time to implement as 1 month. Vendor site does not publish a standard MDR onboarding SLA. | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesBankingCredit Unions | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | <15 minutes mean time to detect across the customer base (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| MTTR | <24 hours mean time to respond (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | G2 shows 4.8/5 across 29 reviews, with reviewers concentrated in banking and financial services and G2 category filters including MDR and EDR. Review themes are positive around customer support, team quality, onboarding and ease of use. Negative themes include querying/log complexity, asset discovery and navigation/reporting friction. Public Reddit signal was not meaningful in this pass. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | FFIECGLBANCUANIST CSFCRI Profile | – |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. DefenseStorm publishes GRID Active self-service restore/data retention content, but public retention terms were not found. | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DefenseStorm and Performanta?
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do DefenseStorm and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
DefenseStorm supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DefenseStorm pricing compare to Performanta?
DefenseStorm pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with DefenseStorm: DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.; Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose DefenseStorm or Performanta?
Choose DefenseStorm if: u.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. DefenseStorm is not ideal for organizations outside U.S. banks and credit unions. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.