Lumifi vs Kroll: MDR comparison 2026
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Kroll is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Kroll serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Lumifi includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Lumifi if:
- •SMB and mid-market teams wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that wraps around their existing EDR
- •Organizations that need security data to stay in their own environment for compliance or policy reasons
- •Healthcare and government buyers looking for specialized MDR with industry-specific detection
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •You need SaaS coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Lumifi does not)
Bottom line: Lumifi (Pure-play MDR) and Kroll (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Lumifi's vendor-agnostic co-managed mdr that works with your existing edr and keeps data in your environment or Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Lumifi and Kroll?
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kroll is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Lumifi covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kroll.
How do Lumifi and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
Lumifi supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Lumifi and included with Kroll.
How does Lumifi pricing compare to Kroll?
Lumifi pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Requires a sales conversation.. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with Lumifi: Co-managed model requires your team to handle parts of remediation, which means staffing costs on your side; SIEM licensing (EventTracker or third-party) may be separate from the MDR contract. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency, customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost, cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose Lumifi or Kroll?
Choose Lumifi if: sMB and mid-market teams wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that wraps around their existing EDR. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection. Lumifi is not ideal for buyers who require independent analyst validation or MITRE-tested detection claims. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).