Cyrebro vs Sattrix
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Cyrebro (Platform vendor) and Sattrix (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals... or Sattrix's sattrix mdr fits buyers that want a services-led provider for managed detection, threat hunting a....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyrebroTECH-AGNOSTIC | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Cyrebro Next-Gen SIEM (native) | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based. Pricing not publicly disclosed | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call. Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. DFIR and advanced forensic investigations are separate from the MDR subscription. Single-region SOC (Israel) means no follow-the-sun coverage, which may matter for compliance or latency requirements | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | APAC |
| Onboarding | Hours to deploy | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesTechnologyHealthcareRetailProfessional Services | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation |
| MTTD | Not published. Vendor claims 'minutes' but provides no measured benchmark. | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published. Automated playbooks handle containment but no measured MTTR is available. | Not published |
| Community view | G2 rates 4.3/5 from 129 reviews. Gartner has recognized Cyrebro as an emerging detection/response vendor. Users praise low false positive rates and actionable guidance but flag slow support and alert noise before tuning is complete. Almost no Reddit discussion. | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA |
| Certifications | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPRGoogle Cloud Partner | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and Sattrix?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Sattrix.
How do Cyrebro and Sattrix differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to Sattrix?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Sattrix pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage..
Should I choose Cyrebro or Sattrix?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.