Cyrebro vs Performanta
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Cyrebro (Platform vendor) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals... or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyrebroTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneCrowdStrike Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Cyrebro Next-Gen SIEM (native) | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based. Pricing not publicly disclosed | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call. Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. DFIR and advanced forensic investigations are separate from the MDR subscription. Single-region SOC (Israel) means no follow-the-sun coverage, which may matter for compliance or latency requirements | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Hours to deploy | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesTechnologyHealthcareRetailProfessional Services | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published. Vendor claims 'minutes' but provides no measured benchmark. | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published. Automated playbooks handle containment but no measured MTTR is available. | Not published |
| Community view | G2 rates 4.3/5 from 129 reviews. Gartner has recognized Cyrebro as an emerging detection/response vendor. Users praise low false positive rates and actionable guidance but flag slow support and alert noise before tuning is complete. Almost no Reddit discussion. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPRGoogle Cloud Partner | – |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and Performanta?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do Cyrebro and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyrebro and not included with Performanta.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to Performanta?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose Cyrebro or Performanta?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.