Cyrebro vs Mandiant: MDR comparison 2026
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Mandiant is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Mandiant serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 5 for Mandiant (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Cyrebro if:
- •SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- •Organizations that need fast onboarding (hours) and do not want to manage a SIEM themselves
- •MSPs looking for a white-label, multi-tenant SOC platform
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts
- •Multi-vendor EDR environments (CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne all supported without agent swap)
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •You need Identity coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: Cyrebro (Platform vendor) and Mandiant (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals... or Mandiant's threat intelligence-driven mdr backed by 500+ intel analysts, frontline ir experience, and google....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and Mandiant?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Mandiant.
How do Cyrebro and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyrebro and not included with Mandiant.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to Mandiant?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated, premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate and must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Cyrebro or Mandiant?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations (~$83K+/year estimated pricing).