Cyrebro vs Macquarie Government
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Macquarie Government is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Macquarie Government is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Cyrebro (Platform vendor) and Macquarie Government (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals... or Macquarie Government's macquarie government is strongest for australian agencies that need sovereign socaas backed by lo....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyrebroTECH-AGNOSTIC | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs |
| SIEM integrations | Cyrebro Next-Gen SIEM (native) | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based. Pricing not publicly disclosed | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call. Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. DFIR and advanced forensic investigations are separate from the MDR subscription. Single-region SOC (Israel) means no follow-the-sun coverage, which may matter for compliance or latency requirements | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | APAC |
| Onboarding | Hours to deploy | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesTechnologyHealthcareRetailProfessional Services | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published. Vendor claims 'minutes' but provides no measured benchmark. | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published. Automated playbooks handle containment but no measured MTTR is available. | Not published |
| Community view | G2 rates 4.3/5 from 129 reviews. Gartner has recognized Cyrebro as an emerging detection/response vendor. Users praise low false positive rates and actionable guidance but flag slow support and alert noise before tuning is complete. Almost no Reddit discussion. | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. |
| Compliance | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP |
| Certifications | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPRGoogle Cloud Partner | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language |
| Founded | 2013 | – |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and Macquarie Government?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Macquarie Government.
How do Cyrebro and Macquarie Government differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyrebro and not included with Macquarie Government.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to Macquarie Government?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose Cyrebro or Macquarie Government?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.