Cyrebro vs Macnica
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Cyrebro (Platform vendor) and Macnica (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals... or Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyrebroTECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Cyrebro Next-Gen SIEM (native) | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based. Pricing not publicly disclosed | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call. Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. DFIR and advanced forensic investigations are separate from the MDR subscription. Single-region SOC (Israel) means no follow-the-sun coverage, which may matter for compliance or latency requirements | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | APAC |
| Onboarding | Hours to deploy | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesTechnologyHealthcareRetailProfessional Services | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published. Vendor claims 'minutes' but provides no measured benchmark. | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published. Automated playbooks handle containment but no measured MTTR is available. | Not published |
| Community view | G2 rates 4.3/5 from 129 reviews. Gartner has recognized Cyrebro as an emerging detection/response vendor. Users praise low false positive rates and actionable guidance but flag slow support and alert noise before tuning is complete. Almost no Reddit discussion. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPRGoogle Cloud Partner | – |
| Founded | 2013 | – |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and Macnica?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do Cyrebro and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyrebro and not included with Macnica.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to Macnica?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose Cyrebro or Macnica?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.