Cyderes vs Palo Alto Networks: MDR comparison 2026
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Palo Alto Networks is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Cyderes targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Palo Alto Networks serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Cyderes if:
- •Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR
- •Mid-market to enterprise wanting technology-agnostic MDR across existing CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender stacks
- •Organizations with significant identity security needs (SailPoint, CyberArk, Okta integrations)
Choose Palo Alto Networks if:
- •Enterprise organizations already invested in the Palo Alto ecosystem (NGFW, Prisma, WildFire) wanting native MDR
- •US government and defense organizations needing FedRAMP Moderate, DoD IL5, StateRAMP compliance
- •Large enterprises facing sophisticated threats needing Unit 42 threat intelligence (500B events/day)
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Palo Alto Networks offers one, Cyderes does not)
Bottom line: Palo Alto Networks is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Cyderes is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Cyderes and Palo Alto Networks?
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Palo Alto Networks is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Cyderes offers ≤30 minutes, Palo Alto Networks offers Not disclosed.
How do Cyderes and Palo Alto Networks differ in response capabilities?
Cyderes supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Palo Alto Networks supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cyderes pricing compare to Palo Alto Networks?
Cyderes pricing: Not publicly disclosed.. Palo Alto Networks pricing: Cortex XDR Pro: ~$81/endpoint/year reported (platform only, pricing sources vary). Unit 42 MDR service is additional custom pricing. Total cost depends on endpoints, tier, coverage scope, and contract terms.. Watch for with Cyderes: No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.; Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. Watch for with Palo Alto Networks: Cortex XDR/XSIAM platform license is a significant prerequisite cost on top of MDR service fee; Cortex Data Lake storage costs are separate and scale with data volume.
Should I choose Cyderes or Palo Alto Networks?
Choose Cyderes if: google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR. Choose Palo Alto Networks if: enterprise organizations already invested in the Palo Alto ecosystem (NGFW, Prisma, WildFire) wanting native MDR. Cyderes is not ideal for sMBs or buyers needing transparent, published pricing. Palo Alto Networks is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations (significant platform prerequisites plus MDR service fee).